A​‌‌‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‍​uthor a three page paper (excluding title, abstract, and reference page) focusing on differences between actuarial and clinical judgment as it relates to the Frye and Daubert Rule/Test/Standards. 1. Delineate the differences between actuarial and clinical judgment methods. 2. Describe the pros and cons of both actuarial and clinical judgment methods as supported by relevant research. 3. Describe the implication of using actuarial and clinical judgment methods as it relates to meeting the Frye and Daubert Standards/Tests of Evidenc​‌‌‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‍​e. 4. Based upon your research and critical thinking, should a professional pick only actuarial or clinical judgment methods, or use both jointly? Clearly explain the rationale behind your decision. Please note: Include a minimum of five peer-reviewed references in this paper. Most of your references should be published within the past ten years. Your paper should be formatted in APA 6th Edition. Please include a title page, abstract, and reference page. These additional pages do not count toward your minimum 3 page requirements​‌‌‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‍​.

Based upon your research and critical thinking, should a professional pick only actuarial or clinical judgment methods, or use both jointly? Clearly explain the rationale behind your decision
Order Now on customessaymasters.com