The essay is about Act III of Sarah Thornton’s 33 Artists in 3 Acts Task: discuss the way in which Andrea Fraser and Damien Hirst function as foils (opponents) of one another in this section of the book. You will want to start by summarizing what Thornton says about each artist (feel free to discuss what you perceive as the author’s assumptions and biases) before stating which of the two artists you find most compelling and why. Make sure to include one quotation about each artist, and to format your paper in MLA. Criteria: 1. write a relevant, clear, and well-developed response 2. quote from Thornton’s chapter to support your point of view 3. analyse any assumptions or biases that come across in Thornton’s writing 4. analyse how your own background might have an influence on your own ideas 5. think creatively 6. make sure your conclusion is related to your observations

REFLECTION ON THORNTON’S ACT III

Leave a Reply

Total:
$8.99